Hamilton, Madison, and Jay

This blog is devoted to a variety of topics including politics, current events, legal issues, and we even take the time to have some occasional fun. After all, blogging is about having a little fun, right?

Location: Mesa, Arizona, United States

Who are we? We're a married couple who has a passion for politics and current events. That's what this site is about. If you read us, you know what we stand for.

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Liar, liar, pants on fire: Bubba's turn

Not content with letting his wife lie her way through the campaign, now former President Bill Clinton has jumped into this. Jake Tapper from ABC News uncovers the revisionism that goes on, line-by-line:

Former President Bill Clinton offered this bit of revisionist history of his wife's Bosnia story in Jasper, Ind., today, one riddled with a veritable sniper fire of errors -- ones necessitating footnotes.

Watch the former President's misstatement-riddled explanation for his wife

"She took a terrible beating in the press for a few days," he said, per ABC News' Sarah Amos, "because she was exhausted at 11 o'clock at night (1) and she started talking about Bosnia and she misstated the circumstances under which she landed in Bosnia. (2)

"Did you all see all that? And oh, they acted like she was practically Mata Hari," he said -- referring to
the Dutch exotic dancer accused by the French of spying for the Germans and executed by a firing squad during World War I -- "like she was making up all this stuff.

"And then the president of Bosnia said, 'Well, it was quite dangerous when she came, there were snipers in the hills all around,' (3) And then Gen. Wes Clarke, who was there trying to make the peace among the Bosnians, said 'Yeah, it was dangerous, let me remind you three of the Americans who were on my peace-keeping team were killed because they had to take a dangerous road 'cause they couldn't go the regular way.'

"And she had to go up into the cockpit with our daughter, in a bullet-proof area, and all the other people had to sit on their bullet-proof flak jackets (4) because it was dangerous. So she immediately (5) said 'OK, I misremembered that, they didn't cancel the welcoming ceremony, but it was pretty dangerous.' "

In Boonville, Ind., also today, he told a different version, saying his wife, "one time late at night (1) when she was exhausted, she misstated and immediately (5) apologized (6) for it, what happened to her in Bosnia in 1995. (7) Did y'all see all that? Oh, they blew it up. Let me just tell you.

"The president of Bosnia and Gen. Wesley Clark -- who was there making peace where we'd lost three peacekeepers who had to ride on a dangerous mountain road because it was too dangerous to go the regular, safe way -- both defended her because they pointed out that when her plane landed in Bosnia, she had to go up to the bulletproof part of the plane, in the front. Everybody else had to put their flak jackets underneath the seat (4) in case they got shot at. And everywhere they went they were covered by Apache helicopters.

"So they just abbreviated the arrival ceremony. Now I say that because what really has mattered is that even then she was interested in our troops. And I think she was the first First Lady since Eleanor Roosevelt to go into a combat zone. (8) And you woulda thought, you know, that she'd robbed a bank the way they carried on about this."

(1) Her most glaringly wrong telling of the tale, on
March 17, 2008, was in the morning.

(2) She actually told versions of the story several times. (And none was at night.)

(3) In an e-mail to journalist Eric Jansson, former acting Bosnian president Ejup Ganic said "we didn't expect snipers," though, "we still believed that some positions on the hills were occupied by radical Serbs, so I was worried about the overall safety."

(4) Not according to the pilot Colonel William "Goose" Changose (Ret.), who said, "nobody under my watch has ever directed anyone to sit on their flak jackets. ... We do not direct people to sit on their flak jackets."

(5) It wasn't immediate at all -- it was 11 days later, first in an editorial board meeting with the Philadelphia Inquirer/Philadelphia Daily News, then later in a press availability.

(6) She never apologized.

(7) It was 1996, not 1995.

(8) He qualified it with "I think," but then-first lady Pat Nixon went to a combat zone in Saigon, Vietnam, in July 1969.

The Clintons are the gift that keeps on giving. Their pathological liars who have no shame when they do tell lies; be they whoppers, like this, or little white ones. I'm guessing they've lied so often that they couldn't tell the truth if their lives depended on it. As a matter of fact, I'm wondering if they've ever told each other the truth, or if that only comes out after it's been proven they lied in the first place.

The Tuzla story has been disproved over and over again. Maybe CBS News should invite him in to watch the footage they have, with all the evidence showing she lied, and film his reaction. Of course we could expect a red-faced, clearly perturbed Bill Clinton lash out at them, accusing them of slandering his wife. "Um, no Bill, we're just showing you the facts, which is that your wife is a lying sack. And apparently, so are you."

She shouldn't have run with that story. She shouldn't have even considered bringing it up. Just stick with the stupid "3 a.m." ads, and keep your fat yap shut about warzones and dodging sniper fire. If anything brings her down this cycle, it'll be how shamelessly she lies, the gets others to lie on her behalf in an effort to force critics to rethink the accusations. Mr. Tapper clearly isn't rethinking anything. He's presented the lies in plain view.

I dare the Clintons to challenge him. They won't, of course, because they know he's right and they're wrong. It would only embarrass them more, and that won't help her get the nomination.

Publius II


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home